People don't necessarily need to be mathematicians to discuss this subject, but they need to be capable of understanding their limitations and asking questions when they don't understand something and referring issues back to real experts when they are not sure if a claimed principle is valid.
Classic...
2 comments:
This guy's hypocrisy knows no bounds.
At his MSN newsgroup, BGergerson writes:
"It is interesting to note that the biologists at science chat are unwilling and unable to engage in honest discussion. If they can't win they won't play. "
http://groups.msn.com/LifeEngineering/general.msnw?action=get_message&mview=0&ID_Message=437&LastModified=4675560392751830390&all_topics=0
Right below that, one sees the following message:
"This message has been deleted due to termination of membership."
The message used to point out how Bergerson avoided answering questions and supporting clakims at ScienceChat.
Apaprently, Bergerson cannot recognize his own double standards.
Wait - this guy just keeps topping himself! It is truly incredible! Any psychologists looking for an interesting subject?
http://www.arn.org/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=30313597&page=0&fpart=9&vc=1
"We see lots of indignant posturing by the Darwinists, but no ability to produce meaningful support for their claims. As usual. "
I mean, textbook projection....
Post a Comment